Luke's accurate use of official titles in the book of ActsThe book of Acts covers the beginning of the Church, from about AD 30 to AD 62. The author, Luke, describes in some detail the travels of the apostle Paul and his co-workers in present day Turkey and Greece. in describing the local officials Paul bumped up against, the author uses a range of different titles. For example, he talks about praetors in Philippi, calls Publius the first man of Malta, refers to the Asiarchs who governed Ephesus, and calls the city council of Thessalonika politarchs. (Acts chapter 17 verse 6) In the past, scholars 'knew' that Luke was an inaccurate and unreliable historian, who did not know what he was writing about, or perhaps just could not be bothered to be consistent in his use of official titles. For example, there was absolutely no known use of the word 'politarch' anywhere in Greek literature. Luke must have got it wrong! But recent discoveries have shown that a range of different titles were in use at the time for local government officials, and that - wherever we know what the title was - the author of Acts got it right. For example, in 1835, a Greek inscription was discovered on an arch at Thessalonika, which contained the title 'politarch'. (The arch itself was destroyed in 1867, but the inscription is now in the British Museum.) Since then, this term has been found in a large number of other inscriptions - several of them at Thessalonika. Luke's use of different titles in other places has also been confirmed by archaeological discoveries. And the same careful and accurate person who wrote Acts also wrote Luke's gospel. In the introduction to his Gospel, he says this: Many people have written accounts about the
events
that took place among us. They used as their source material the
reports
circulating among us from the early disciples and other
eyewitnesses of
what God has done in fulfillment of his promises. Having carefully
investigated all of these accounts from the beginning, I have
decided to
write a careful summary for you, to reassure you of the truth of
all you
were taught. (Gospel of Luke, chapter 1 verses 1-4)
So discoveries in archaeology have confirmed that Luke, the author of 'Acts', was a careful and accurate historian, with first-hand knowledge of his subject, who was accurate in his use of titles for government officials. This is yet more confirmation that the Bible is real history: real people, in real places. |
Download a 2-minute audio presentation introducing 'Facing the Challenge' 2004
Focus
Radio |
What's new on the site?'The Passion of the Christ'Mel Gibson's 'The Passion of the Christ' ignited strong feelings even before it was released, with some Christian and Jewish groups accusing it of anti-Semitism, while Churches block-booked tickets. Our review page has links to a wide range of resources, both for those who see the film and have questions, and for followers of Christ who want to make the most of the opportunity this film represents. Read more... Have scientists created life?The belief that scientists have succeeded in creating life from lifeless matter has become part of our current mythology. Yet the Miller-Urey experiment, on which this belief is based, never proved as much as was claimed for it, and is now regarded as seriously flawed. Read more... |