Turn off
Pop-up blocker to insure hyperlinks work
properly.
Leading theologian and polemicist
whose
arguments against gnostic sects
helped
establish the doctrinal standards of Catholic Christianity:
creed, canon
of scripture & apostolic succession of bishops. A native
Greek from
Smyrna (Asia Minor), Irenaeus came to prominence after migrating
to the
Latin west. In 177 CE he was appointed bishop of Lugdunum, Gaul
(Lyons,
France) where he soon published his five volume Refutation
&
Overthrow of what is wrongly called 'Knowledge' (commonly
referred
to simply as Against Heresies). His defense of four
canonical
gospels became the standard orthodox view of their authorship,
sequence
& circumstances of composition:
Matthew also published a
gospel in
writing among the Hebrews in their own language, while
Peter
& Paul were preaching the gospel and founding the church
in Rome.
But after their death, Mark, the disciple &
interpreter of
Peter, also transmitted to us in writing what Peter
used to
preach. And Luke, Paul's associate, also set down in a
book the
gospel that Paul used to preach. Later, John, the Lord's
disciple ---
the one who lay on his lap --- also set out the gospel while
living at
Ephesus in Asia Minor. (Against Heresies
3.1.1)
Irenaeus follows the canonical
sequence. He
did not, however, suggest any literary relationship
between these
gospels. Note also that he did not explicitly mention the order
of
composition of the synoptics. While he claims John wrote
"later," he
lists Matthew, Mark & Luke with parallel grammatical
conjunctions ("also...also...also").
The only thing in Irenaeus'
statement that
would lead someone to infer the chronological priority of
Matthew is his
attempt to link the canonical gospels with the activity of Peter
&
Paul. He claims that a Hebrew edition of this gospel was
in
circulation during the lifetime of the leading apostles,
while
Mark & Luke were composed "after their death." The source
from which
Irenaeus derived this dating is not clear. While he knew &
valued
the now lost commentaries of Papias, he does
not credit
this chronological data to that source. Nor do the excerpts from
Papias
cited by Eusebius
support this sequence.
It is possible---even
probable---that
Irenaeus' dating of the gospels is based on nothing more than an
educated guess. Irenaeus was, after all, eager to draw direct
links
between the doctrinal authorities of Catholic Christianity and
the
apostolic generation. The gospels list Matthew with Peter &
other
apostles (Mark 3:16-19 & parallels), a role that Paul
claimed for
himself (1 Cor 9:1 & Gal. 2:8). So Irenaeus would naturally
infer
that a gospel with an apostolic name must come from the era that
apostles were still active. Mark & Luke, on the other hand,
were
names only associated with companions of the apostles (1 Pet.
5:13; Col.
3:14). So Irenaeus could safely assign works attributed to them
to the
post-apostolic era.
In any case, Irenaeus claims
historical
priority only for a Hebrew version of Matthew which is no
longer
in existence. Unlike Papias, he does not mention the translation
of this
work. Thus, Irenaeus does not support the opinion of
those who
claim that the current Greek edition of Matthew was
composed
prior to the other gospels. Nor does his claim that Mark
transcribed
Peter's preaching support the view of Augustine,
Griesbach & other western Christians that Mark
condensed
Matthew.
Other On-line
Resources: