Eusebius of Caesarea We have discussed in the preceding book those subjects in ecclesiastical
history which it was necessary to treat by way of introduction, and have
accompanied them with brief proofs. Such were the divinity of the saving Word,
and the antiquity of the doctrines which we teach, as well as of that
evangelical life which is led by Christians, together with the events which
have taken place in connection with Christ's recent appearance, and in
connection with his passion and with the choice of the apostles.
In the present book let us examine the events which took place after his
ascension, confirming some of them from the divine Scriptures, and others from
such writings as we shall refer to from time to time.
First, then, in the place of Judas, the betrayer, Matthias,
who, as has
been shown
was also one of the Seventy, was chosen to the apostolate. And
there were appointed to the diaconate,
for the service of the
congregation, by prayer and the laying on of the hands of the apostles,
approved men,
seven in number, of whom Stephen was one.
He first, after the Lord, was
stoned to death at the time of his ordination by the slayers of the Lord, as
if he had been promoted for this very purpose.
And thus he was the first to
receive the crown, corresponding to his name,
which belongs to the martyrs
of Christ, who are worthy of the meed of victory. Then James, whom the
ancients surnamed the Just
on account of the excellence of his virtue, is
recorded to have been the first to be made bishop of the church of Jerusalem.
This James was called the brother of the Lord
because he was known as a son
of Joseph,
and Joseph was supposed to be the father of Christ, because the
Virgin, being betrothed to him, "was found with child by the Holy Ghost before
they came together,"
as the account of the holy Gospels shows.
But Clement in the sixth book of his Hypotyposes
writes thus: "For
they say that Peter and James and John after the ascension of our Saviour, as
if also preferred by our Lord, strove not after honor, but chose James the
Just bishop of Jerusalem."
But the same writer, in the seventh book of the same work, relates also
the following things concerning him: "The Lord after his resurrection imparted
knowledge to James the Just and to John and Peter, and they imparted it to the
rest of the apostles, and the rest of the apostles to the seventy, of whom
Barnabas was one.
But there were two Jameses:
one called the Just, who
was thrown from the pinnacle of the temple and was beaten to death with a club
by a fuller,
and another who was beheaded."
Paul also makes mention of
the same James the Just, where he writes, "Other of the apostles saw I none,
save James the Lord's brother."
At that time also the promise of our Saviour to the king of the
Osrhoenians was fulfilled. For Thomas, under a divine impulse, sent Thaddeus
to Edessa as a preacher and evangelist of the religion of Christ, as we have
shown a little above from the document found there?
When he came to that place he healed Abgarus by the word of Christ; and
after bringing all the people there into the right attitude of mind by means
of his works, and leading them to adore the power of Christ, he made them
disciples of the Saviour's teaching. And from that time down to the present
the whole city of the Edessenes has been devoted to the name of Christ,
offering no common proof of the beneficence of our Saviour
toward them also.
These things have been drawn from ancient accounts; but let us now turn
again to the divine Scripture. When the first and greatest persecution was
instigated by the Jews against the church of Jerusalem in connection with the
martyrdom of Stephen, and when all the disciples, except the Twelve, were
scattered throughout Judea and Samaria,
some, as the divine Scripture
says, went as far as Phoenicia and Cyprus and Antioch, but could not yet
venture to impart the word of faith to the nations, and therefore preached it
to the Jews alone.
During this time Paul was still persecuting the church, and entering the
houses of believers was dragging men and women away and committing them to
prison.
Philip also, one of those who with Stephen had been entrusted with the
diaconate, being among those who were scattered abroad, went down to
Samaria,
and being filled with the divine power, he first preached the
word to the inhabitants of that country. And divine grace worked so mightily
with him that even Simon Magus with many others was attracted by his
words.
Simon was at that time so celebrated, and had acquired, by his
jugglery, such influence over those who were deceived by him, that he was
thought to be the great power of God.
But at this time, being amazed at
the wonderful deeds wrought by Philip through the divine power, he reigned and
counterfeited faith in Christ, even going so far as to receive baptism.
And what is surprising, the same thing is done even to this day by those
who follow his most impure heresy.
For they, after the manner of their
forefather, slipping into the Church, like a pestilential and leprous disease
greatly afflict those into whom they are able to infuse the deadly and
terrible poison concealed in themselves.
The most of these have been
expelled as soon as they have been caught in their wickedness, as Simon
himself, when detected by Peter, received the merited punishment.
But as the preaching of the Saviour's Gospel was daily advancing, a
certain providence led from the land of the Ethiopians an officer of the queen
of that country,
for Ethiopia even to the present day is ruled, according
to ancestral custom, by a woman. He, first among the Gentiles, received of the
mysteries of the divine word from Philip in consequence of a revelation, and
having become the first-fruits of believers throughout the world, he is said
to have been the first on returning to his country to proclaim the knowledge
of the God of the universe and the life-giving sojourn of our Saviour among
men;
so that through him in truth the prophecy obtained its fulfillment,
which declares that "Ethiopia stretcheth out her hand unto God."
In addition to these, Paul, that "chosen vessel,"
"not of men neither
through men, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ himself and of God the
Father who raised him from the dead,"
was appointed an apostle, being made
worthy of the call by a vision and by a voice which was uttered in a
revelation from heaven.
AND when the wonderful resurrection and ascension of our Saviour were
already noised abroad, in accordance with an ancient custom which prevailed
among the rulers of the provinces, of reporting to the emperor the novel
occurrences which took place in them, in order that nothing might escape him,
Pontius Pilate informed Tiberius
of the reports which were noised abroad
through all Palestine concerning the resurrection of our Saviour Jesus from
the dead.
He gave an account also of other wonders which he had learned of him, and
how, after his death, having risen from the dead, he was now believed by many
to be a God.
They say that Tiberius referred the matter to the Senate,
but that they rejected it, ostensibly because they had not first examined into
the matter
, but in reality because the saving teaching of the divine Gospel
did not need the confirmation and recommendation of men.
But although the Senate of the Romans rejected the proposition made in
regard to our Saviour, Tiberius still retained the opinion which he had held
at first, and contrived no hostile measures against Christ.
These
things are recorded by Tertullian,
a man well versed in the laws of the
Romans,
and in other respects of high repute, and one of those especially
distinguished in Rome.
In his apology for the Christians,
which was
written by him in the Latin language, and has been translated into Greek,
he writes as follows:
"But in order that we may give an account of these laws from their
origin, it was an ancient decree n that no one should be consecrated a God by
the emperor until the Senate had expressed its approval. Marcus Aurelius did
thus concerning a certain idol, Alburnus.
And this is a point in favor of
our doctrine,
that among you divine dignity is conferred by human decree.
If a God does not please a man he is not made a God. Thus, according to this
custom, it is necessary for man to be gracious to God.
Tiberius, therefore, under whom the name of Christ made its entry into
the world, when this doctrine was reported to him from Palestine, where it
first began, communicated with the Senate, making it clear to them that he was
pleased with the doctrine.
But the Senate, since it had not itself proved
the matter, rejected it. But Tiberius continued to hold his own opinion, and
threatened death to the accusers of the Christians."
Heavenly providence
had wisely instilled this into his mind in order that the doctrine of the
Gospel, unhindered at its beginning, might spread in all directions throughout
the world.
Thus, under the influence of heavenly power, and with the divine
co-operation, the doctrine of the Saviour, like the rays of the sun, quickly
illumined the whole world;
and straightway, in accordance with the divine
Scriptures,
the voice of the inspired evangelists and apostles went forth
through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world.
In every city and village, churches were quickly established, filled with
multitudes of people like a replenished threshing-floor. And those whose
minds, in consequence of errors which had descended to them from their
forefathers, were fettered by the ancient disease of idolatrous superstition,
were, by the power of Christ operating through the teaching and the wonderful
works of his disciples, set free, as it were, from terrible masters, and found
a release from the most cruel bondage. They renounced with abhorrence every
species of demoniacal polytheism, and confessed that there was only one God,
the creator of all things, and him they honored with the rites of true piety,
through the inspired and rational worship which has been planted by our
Saviour among men.
But the divine grace being now poured out upon the rest of the nations
Cornelius, of C'sarea in Palestine, with his whole house, through a divine
revelation and the agency of Peter, first received faith in Christ;
and
after him a multitude of other Greeks in Antioch,
to whom those who were
scattered by the persecution of Stephen had preached the Gospel. When the
church of Antioch was now increasing and abounding, and a multitude of
prophets from Jerusalem were on the ground,
among them Barnabas and Paul
and in addition many other brethren, the name of Christians first sprang up
there,
as from a fresh and life-giving fountain.
And Agabus, one of the
prophets who was with them, uttered a prophecy concerning the famine which was
about to take place,
and Paul and Barnabas were sent to relieve the
necessities of the brethren.
After the Death of Tiberius, Caius appointed
Agrippa King of the Jews, having punished Herod with Perpetual Exile. Tiberius
died, after having reigned about twenty-two years,
and Caius succeeded him
in the empire.
He immediately gave the government of the Jews to
Agrippa,
making him king over the tetrarchies of Philip and of Ly-sanias;
in addition to which he bestowed upon him, not long afterward, the tetrarchy
of Herod,
having punished Herod
] -->
and his wife Herodias with perpetual exile
on account of
numerous crimes. Josephus is a witness to these facts.
Under this emperor,
Philo
became known;
a man most celebrated not only among many of our own, but also among many
scholars without the Church. He was a Hebrew by birth, but was inferior to
none of those who held high dignities in Alexandria. How exceedingly he
labored in the Scriptures and in the studies of his nation is plain to all
from the work which he has done. How familiar he was with philosophy and with
the liberal studies of foreign nations, it is not necessary to say, since he
is reported to have surpassed all his contemporaries in the study of Platonic
and Pythagorean. philosophy, to which he particularly devoted his
attention.
Philo has given us an account, in five books, of the misfortunes of the
Jews under Caius.
He recounts at the same time the madness of Caius: how he
called himself a god, and performed as emperor innumerable acts of tyranny;
and he describes further the miseries of the Jews under him, and gives a
report of the embassy upon which he himself was sent to Rome in behalf of his
fellow-countrymen in Alexandria;
how when he appeared before Caius in
behalf of the laws of his fathers he received nothing but laughter and
ridicule, and almost incurred the risk of his life. Josephus also makes
mention of these things in the eighteenth book of his Antiquities, in the
following words: a "A sedition having arisen in Alexandria between the Jews
that dwell there and the Greeks,
three deputies were chosen from each
faction and went to Caius.
One of the Alexandrian deputies was Apion,
who uttered many slanders
against the Jews; among other things saying that they neglected the honors due
to Caesar. For while all other subjects of Rome erected altars and temples to
Caius, and in all other respects treated him just as they did the gods, they
alone considered it disgraceful to honor him with statues and to swear by his
name. And when Apion had uttered many severe charges by which he hoped that
Caius would be aroused, as indeed was likely, Philo, the chief of the Jewish
embassy, a man celebrated in every respect, a brother of Alexander the
Alabarch,
and not unskilled in philosophy, was prepared to enter
upon a defense in reply to his accusations. But Caius prevented him and
ordered him to leave, and being very angry, it was plain that he meditated
some severe measure against them. And Philo departed covered with insult and
told the Jews that were with him to be of good courage; for while Caius was
raging against them he was in fact already contending with God." Thus far
Josephus. And Philo himself, in the work On the Embassy
which he wrote,
describes accurately and in detail the things which were done by him at that
time. But I shall omit the most of them and record only those things which
will make clearly evident to the reader that the misfortunes of the Jews came
upon them not long after their daring deeds against Christ and on account of
the same. And in the first place he relates that at Rome in the reign of
Tiberius, Sejanus, who at that time enjoyed great influence with the emperor,
made every effort to destroy the Jewish nation utterly;
and that in Judea,
Pilate, under whom the crimes against the Saviour were committed, attempted
something contrary to the Jewish law in respect to the temple, which was at
that time still standing in Jerusalem, and excited them to the greatest
tumults.
After the death of Tiberius, Caius received the empire, and, besides
innumerable other acts of tyranny against many people, he greatly afflicted
especially the whole nation of the Jews
These things we may learn briefly
from the words of Philo, who writes as follows:
"So great was the caprice
of Caius in his2. conduct toward all, and especially toward the nation of the
Jews. The latter he so bitterly hated that he appropriated to himself their
places of worship in the other cities,
and beginning with Alexandria he
filled them with images and statues of himself
. The temple in the holy city, which
had hitherto been left untouched, and had been regarded as an inviolable
asylum, he altered and transformed into a temple of his own, that it might be
called the temple of the visible Jupiter, the younger Caius."
Innumerable
other terrible and almost indescribable calamities which came upon the Jews
in Alexandria during the reign of the same emperor, are recorded by the same
author in a second work, to which he gave the title, On the Virtues.
With
him agrees also Josephus, who likewise indicates that the misfortunes of the
whole nation began with the time of Pilate, and with their daring crimes
against the Saviour.
Hear what be says in the second book of his Jewish
War, where he writes as follows:
"Pilate being sent to Judea as procurator
by Tiberius, secretly carried veiled images of the emperor, called ensigns,
to Jerusalem by night. The following day this caused the greatest disturbance
among the Jews. For those who were near were confounded at the sight,
beholding their laws, as it were, trampled under foot. For they allow no image
to be set up in their city." Comparing these things with the writings of the
evangelists, you will see that it was not long before there came upon them the
penalty for the exclamation which they had uttered under the same Pilate, when
they cried out that they had no other king than C'sar.
The same writer
further records that after this another calamity overtook them. He writes as
follows:
"After this he. stirred up another tumult by snaking use of the
holy treasure, which is called Corban,
in the construction of an aqueduct
three hundred stadia in length.
The multitude were greatly displeased
at it, and when Pilate was in Jerusalem they surrounded his tribunal and gave
utterance to loud complaints. But he, anticipating the tumult, had distributed
through the crowd armed soldiers disguised in citizen's clothing, forbidding
them to use the sword, but commanding them to strike with clubs those who
should make an outcry. To them he now gave the preconcerted signal from the
tribunal. And the Jews being beaten, many of them perished in consequence of
the blows, while many others were trampled under foot by their own countrymen
in their flight, and thus lost their lives. But the multitude, overawed by the
fate of those who
were slain, held their peace." In addition to these the same author
records
many other tumults which were stirred up in Jerusalem itself, and
shows that from that time seditions and wars and mischievous plots followed
each other in quick succession, and never ceased in the city and in all Judea
until finally the siege of Vespasian overwhelmed them. Thus the divine
vengeance overtook the Jews for the crimes which they dared to commit against
Christ.
It is worthy of note that Pilate himself, who was governor in the time of
our Saviour, is reported to have fallen into such misfortunes under Caius,
whose times we are recording, that he was forced to become his own murderer
and executioner;
and thus divine vengeance, as it seems, was not long in
overtaking him. This is stated by those Greek historians who have recorded the
Olympiads, together with the respective events which have taken place in each
period.
Caius had held the power not quite four years,
when he was succeeded by
the emperor Claudius. Under him the world was visited with a famine,
which
writers that are entire strangers to our religion have recorded in their
histories.
And thus the prediction of Agabus recorded in the Acts of the
Apostles,
according to which the whole world was to be visited by a famine,
received its fulfillment. And Luke, in the Acts, after mentioning the famine
in the time of Claudius, and stating that the brethren of Antioch, each
according to his ability, sent to the brethren of Judea by the hands of Paul
and Barnabas,
adds the following account.
"Now about that time"
"Herod the King
stretched forth his
hands to vex certain of the Church. And he killed James the brother of John
with the sword." And concerning this James, Clement, in the seventh book of
his Hypotyposes,
relates a story
which is worthy of mention; telling it as he received it from those who had
lived before him. He says that the one who led James to the judgment-seat,
when he saw him bearing his testimony, was moved, and confessed that he was
himself also a Christian.
They were both therefore, he says, led away together;
and on the way he begged James to forgive him. And he, after considering a
little, said, "Peace be with thee," and kissed him. And thus they were both
beheaded at the same time.
And then, as the divine Scripture says,
Herod, upon the death of James,
seeing that the deed pleased the Jews, attacked Peter also and committed him
to prison, and would have slain him if he had not, by the divine appearance of
an angel who came to him by night, been wonderfully released from his bonds,
and thus liberated for the service of the Gospel. Such was the providence of
God in respect to Peter.
The consequences of the king's undertaking against the apostles were no,
long deferred, but the avenging minister of divine justice overtook him
immediately after his plots against them, as the Book of Acts records.
For
when he had journeyed to C'sarea, on a notable feast-day, clothed in a
splendid and royal garment, he delivered an address to the people from a lofty
throne in front of the tribunal. And when all the multitude applauded the
speech, as if it were the voice of a god and not of a man, the Scripture
relates that an angel of the Lord smote him, and being eaten of worms he gave
up the ghost.
We must admire the account of Josephus for its agreement with the divine
Scriptures in regard to this wonderful event; for he clearly bears witness to
the truth in the nineteenth book of his Antiquities, where he relates the
wonder in the following words:
"He had completed the third year of his reign over all Judea
when he
came to C'sarea, which was formerly called Strato's Tower.
There he held
games in honor of C'sar, learning that this was a festival observed in behalf
of C'sar's safety.
At this festival was collected a great multitude of the
highest and most honorable men in the province.
And on the second day of the games he proceeded to the theater at break of
day, wearing a garment entirely of silver and of wonderful texture. And there
the silver, illuminated by the reflection of the sun's earliest rays, shone
marvelously, gleaming so brightly as to produce a sort of fear and terror in
those who gazed upon him.
And immediately his flatterers, some from one place, others from another,
raised up their voices in a way that was not for his good, calling him a god,
and saying, 'Be thou merciful; if up to this time we have feared thee as a
man, henceforth we confess that thou art superior to the nature of mortals.'
The king did not rebuke them, nor did he reject their impious
flattery. But after a little, looking up, he saw an angel sitting above his
head.
And this he quickly perceived would be the cause of evil as
it had once been the cause of good fortune,
and he was smitten with a
heart-piercing pain.
And straightway distress, beginning with the greatest violence, seized his
bowels. And looking upon his friends he said, 'I, your god, am now commanded
to depart this life; and fate thus I on the spot disproves the lying words you
have just uttered concerning me. He who has been called immortal by you is now
led away to die; but our destiny must be accepted as God has determined it.
For we have passed our life by no means ingloriously, but in that splendor
which is pronounced happiness.'
And when he had said this he labored with an increase of pain. He was
accordingly carried in haste to the palace, while the report spread among all
that the king would undoubtedly soon die. But the multitude, with their wives
and children, sitting on sackcloth after the custom of their fathers, implored
God in behalf of the king, and every place was filled with lamentation and
tears.
And the king as he lay in a lofty chamber, and saw them below lying
prostrate on the ground, could not refrain from weeping himself.
And after suffering continually for five days with pain in the bowels, he
departed this life, in the fifty-fourth year of his age, and in the seventh
year of his reign.
Four years he ruled under the Emperor Caius -- three of
them over the tetrarchy of Philip, to which was added in the fourth year that
of Herod
-- and three years during the reign of the Emperor Claudius."
I marvel greatly that Josephus, in these things as well as in others, so
fully agrees with the divine Scriptures. But if there should seem to any one
to be a disagreement in respect to the name of the king, the time at least and
the events show that the same person is meant, whether the change of name has
been caused by the error of a copyist, or is due to the fact that he, like so
many, bore two names.
Luke, in the Acts, introduces Gamaliel as saying, at the consultation
which was held concerning the apostles, that at the time referred to,
"rose
up Theudas boasting himself to be somebody; who was slain; and all, as many as
obeyed him, were scattered."
Let us therefore add the account of Josephus
concerning this man. He records in the work mentioned just above, the
following circumstances:
"While Fadus was procurator of Judea
a certain impostor called
Theudas
persuaded
a very great multitude to take their possessions and follow him to the river
Jordan. For he said that he was a prophet, and that the river should be
divided at his command, and afford them an easy passage.
And with these words he deceived many. But Fadus did not permit them to
enjoy their folly, but sent a troop of horsemen against them, who fell upon
them unexpectedly and slew many of them and took many others alive, while they
took Theudas himself captive, and cut off his head and carried it to
Jerusalem." Besides this he also makes mention of the famine, which took place
in the reign of Claudius, in the following words.
"And at this time" it came to pass that the great famine a took place
in Judea, in which the queen Helen,
having purchased grain from Egypt with
large sums, distributed it to the needy."
You will find this statement also in agreement with the Acts of the
Apostles, where it is said that the disciples at Antioch, "each according to
his ability, determined to send relief to the brethren that dwelt in Judea;
which also they did, and sent it to the elders by the hands of Barnabas and
Paul."
But splendid monuments
of this Helen, Of whom the historian has
made mention, are still shown in the suburbs of the city which is now called
'lia,
But she is said to have been queen of the Adiabeni.
But faith in our Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ having now been diffused
among all men,
the enemy of man's salvation contrived a plan for seizing
the imperial city for himself. He conducted thither the above-mentioned
Simon,
aided him in his deceitful arts, led many of the inhabitants of Rome
astray, and thus brought them into his own power. This is stated by
Justin,
one of our distinguished writers who lived not long after the time
of the apostles. Concerning him I shall speak in the proper place.
Take and
read the work of this
man, who in the first Apology
which he addressed to Antonine in behalf of
our religion writes as follows:
"And after the ascension of the Lord
into heaven the demons put forward certain men who said they were gods, and
who were not only allowed by you to go unpersecuted, but were even deemed
worthy of honors. One of them was Simon, a Samaritan of the village of
Gitto,
who in the reign of Claudius C'sar
performed in your imperial
city some mighty acts of magic by the art of demons operating in him, and was
considered a god, and as a god was honored by you with a statue, which was
erected in the river Tiber,
between the two bridges, and bore this
inscription in the Latin tongue, Simoni Deo Sancto, that is, To Simon the Holy
God.
And nearly all the Samaritans and a few even of other nations confess
and worship him as the first God. And there went around with him at that time
a certain Helena
who had formerly been a prostitute in Tyre of Phoenicia;
and her they call the first idea that proceeded from him."
Justin relates
these things, and Iren'us also agrees with him in the first book of his
work, Against Heresies, where he gives an account of the man
and of his
profane and impure teaching. It would be superfluous to quote his account
here, for it is possible for those who wish to know the origin and the lives
and the false doctrines of each of the heresiarchs that have followed him, as
well as the customs practiced by them all, to find them treated at length in
the above-mentioned work of Iren'us. We have understood that Simon was the
author of all heresy.
From his time down to the present those who have
followed his heresy have reigned the sober philosophy of the Christians, which
is celebrated among all on account of its purity of life. But they
nevertheless have embraced again the superstitions of idols, which they seemed
to have renounced; and they fall down before pictures and images of Simon
himself and of the above-mentioned Helena who was with him; and they venture
to worship them with incense and sacrifices and libations. But those matters
which they keep more secret than these, in regard to which they say that one
upon first hearing them would be astonished, and, to use one of the written
phrases in vogue among them, would be confounded,
are in truth full of
amazing things, and of madness and folly, being of such a sort that it is
impossible not only to commit them to writing, but also for modest men even to
utter them with the lips on account of their excessive baseness and
lewdness.
For what ever could be conceived of, viler than the
vilest thing -- all that has been outdone by this most abominable sect, which
is composed of those who make a sport of those miserable females that are
literally overwhelmed with all kinds of vices.
The evil power,
who hates all that is good and plots against the
salvation of men, constituted Simon at that time the father and author of such
wickedness,
as if to make him a mighty antagonist of the great, inspired
apostles of our Saviour. For that divine and celestial grace which co-operates
with its ministers, by their appearance and presence, quickly extinguished the
kindled flame of evil, and humbled and cast down through them "every high
thing that exalted itself against the knowledge of God."
Wherefore neither
the conspiracy of Simon nor that of any of the others who arose at that period
could accomplish anything in those apostolic times. For everything was
conquered and subdued by the splendors of the truth and by the divine word
itself which had but lately begun to shine from heaven upon men, and which was
then flourishing upon earth, and dwelling in the apostles themselves.
Immediately
the above-mentioned impostor was smitten in the eyes of his
mind by a divine and miraculous flash, and after the evil deeds done by him
had been first detected by the apostle Peter in Judea,
he fled and made a
great journey across the sea from the East to the West, thinking that only
thus could he live according to his mind. And coming to the city of Rome,
by the mighty co-operation of that power which was lying in wait there, he was
in a short time so successful in his undertaking that those who dwelt there
honored him as a god by the erection of a statue.
But this did not last
long. For immediately, during the reign of Claudius, the all-good and
gracious Providence, which watches over all things, led Peter, that strongest
and greatest of the apostles, and the one who on account of his virtue was the
speaker for all the others, to Rome s against this great corrupter of life. He
like a noble commander of God, clad in divine armor, carried the costly
merchandise of the light of the understanding from the East to those who dwelt
in the West, proclaiming the light itself, and the word which brings salvation
to souls, and preaching the kingdom of heaven.
And thus when the divine word had made its home among them,
the power
of Simon was quenched and immediately destroyed, together with the man
himself.
And so greatly did the splendor of piety illumine the minds of
Peter's hearers that they were not satisfied with hearing once only, and were
not content with the unwritten teaching of the divine Gospel, but with all
sorts of entreaties they besought Mark,
a follower of Peter, and the one
whose Gospel is extant, that he would leave them a written monument of the
doctrine which had been orally communicated to them. Nor did they cease until
they had prevailed with the man, and had thus become the occasion of the
written Gospel which bears the name of Mark.
And they say that Peter when
he had learned, through a revelation of the Spirit, of that which had been
done, was pleased with the zeal of the men, and that the work obtained the
sanction of his authority for the purpose of being used in the churches.
Clement in the eighth book of his Hypotyposes gives this account, and with him
agrees the bishop of Hierapolis named Papias.
And Peter makes mention of
Mark in his first epistle which they say that he wrote in Rome itself, as is
indicated by him, when he calls the city, by a figure, Babylon, as he does in
the following words: "The church that is at Babylon, elected together with
you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son."
And they say that this Mark was the first that was sent to Egypt, and that
he proclaimed the Gospel which he had written, and first established churches
in Alexandria. And the multitude of believers, both men and women, that
were collected there at the very outset, and lived lives of the most
philosophical and excessive asceticism, was so great, that Philo thought it
worth while to describe their pursuits, their meetings, their entertainments,
and their whole manner of life."
It is also said that Philo in the reign of Claudius became acquainted at
Rome with Peter, who was then preaching there.
Nor is this indeed
improbable, for the work of which we have spoken, and which was composed by
him some years later, clearly contains those rules of the Church which are
even to this day observed among us. And since he describes as accurately as
possible the life of our ascetics, it is clear that he not only knew, but that
he also approved, while he venerated and extolled, the apostolic men of his
time, who were as it seems of the Hebrew race, and hence observed, after the
manner of the Jews, the most of the customs of the ancients. In the work to
which he gave the title, On a Contemplative Life or on Suppliants,
after
affirming in the first place that he will add to those things which he is
about to relate nothing contrary to truth or of his own invention,
he says
that these men were called Therapeut' and the women that were with them
Therapeutrides.
He then adds the reasons for such a name, explaining it
from the fact that they applied remedies and healed the souls of those who
came to them, by relieving them like physicians, of evil passions, or from the
fact that they served and worshiped the Deity in purity and sincerity. Whether
Philo himself gave them this name, employing an epithet well suited to their
mode of life, or whether the first of them really called themselves so in the
beginning, since the name of Christians was not yet everywhere known, we need
not discuss here. He bears witness, however, that first of all they renounce
their property. When they begin the philosophical
mode of life, he says,
they give up their goods to their relatives, and then, renouncing all the
cares of life, they go forth beyond the walls and dwell in lonely fields and
gardens, knowing well that intercourse with people of a different character is
unprofitable and harmful. They did this at that time, as seems probable, under
the influence of a spirited and ardent faith, practicing in emulation the
prophets' mode of life. For in the Acts of the Apostles, a work universally
acknowledged as authentic,
it is recorded that all the
companions of the apostles sold their possessions and their property and
distributed to all according to the necessity of each one, so that no one
among them was in want. "For as many as were possessors of lands or houses,"
as the account says, "sold them and brought the prices of the things that were
sold, and laid them at the apostles' feet, so that distribution was made unto
every man according as he had need."
Philo bears witness to facts very much like those here described and then
adds the following account:
"Everywhere in the world is this race
found.
For it was fitting that both Greek
and Barbarian should share in what is
perfectly good. But the race particularly abounds in Egypt, in each of its
so-called nomes,
and especially about Alexandria. The best men from every
quarter emigrate, as if to a colony of the Therapeut''s fatherland,
to a
certain very suitable spot which lies above the lake Maria
upon a low hill
excellently situated on account of its security and the mildness of the
atmosphere" And then a little further on, after describing the kind of
houses which they had, he speaks as follows concerning their churches, which
were scattered about here and there:
"In each house there is a sacred
apartment which is called a sanctuary and monastery,
where, quite alone,
they perform the mysteries of the religious life. They bring nothing into it,
neither drink nor food, nor any of the other things which contribute to the
necessities of the body, but only the laws, and the inspired oracles of the
prophets, and hymns and such other things as augment and makeperfect their
knowledge and piety." And after some other matters he says:
"The
whole interval, from morning to evening, is for them a time of exercise. For
they read the holy Scriptures, and explain the philosophy of their fathers in
an allegorical manner, regarding the written words as symbols of hidden truth
which is communicated in obscure figures. They have also writings of
ancient men, who were the founders of their sect, and who left many monuments
of the allegorical method. These they use as models, and imitate their
principles." These things seem to have been stated by a man who had heard
them expounding their sacred writings. But it is highly probable that the
works of the ancients, which he says they had, were the Gospels and the
writings of the apostles, and probably some expositions of the ancient
prophets, such as are contained in the Epistle to the Hebrews, and in many
others of Paul's Epistles. Then again he writes as follows concerning the
new psalms which they composed: "So that they not only spend their time in
meditation, but they also compose songs and hymns to God in every variety of
metre and melody, though they divide them, of course, into measures of more
than common solemnity." The same book contains an account of many other
things, but it seemed necessary to select those facts which exhibit the
characteristics of the ecclesiastical mode of life. But if any one thinks that
what has been said is not peculiar to the Gospel polity, but that it can be
applied to others besides those mentioned, let him be convinced by the
subsequent words of the same author, in which, if he is unprejudiced, he will
find undisputed testimony on this subject. Philo's words are as follows:
"Having laid down temperance as a sort of foundation in the soul, they
build upon it the other virtues. None of them may take food or drink before
sunset, since they regard philosophizing as a work worthy of the light, but
attention to the wants of the body as proper only in the darkness, and
therefore assign the day to the former, but to the latter a small portion of
the night. But some, in whom a great desire for knowledge dwells, forget to
take food for three days; and some are so delighted and feast so luxuriously
upon wisdom, which furnishes doctrines richly and without stint, that they
abstain even twice as long as this, and are accustomed, after six days,
scarcely to take necessary food." These statements of Philo we regard as
referring clearly and indisputably to those of our communion. But if after
these things any one still obstinately persists in denying the reference, let
him renounce his incredulity and be convinced by yet more striking examples,
which are to be found nowhere else than in the evangelical religion of the
Christians.
For they say that there were women also with those of whom
we are speaking, and that the most of them were aged virgins
who had
preserved
their chastity, not out of necessity, as some of the priestesses among the
Greeks,
but rather by their own choice, through zeal and a desire for
wisdom. And that in their earnest desire to live with it as their companion
they paid no attention to the pleasures of the body, seeking not mortal but
immortal progeny, which only the pious soul is able to bear of itself. Then
after a little he adds still more emphatically:
"They expound the Sacred
Scriptures figuratively by means of allegories. For the whole law seems to
these men to resemble a living organism, of which the spoken words constitute
the body, while the hidden sense stored up within the words constitutes the
soul. This hidden meaning has first been particularly studied by this sect,
which sees, revealed as in a mirror of names, the surpassing beauties of the
thoughts." Why is it necessary to add to these things their meetings and the
respective occupations of the men and of the women during those meetings, and
the practices which are even to the present day habitually observed by us,
especially such as we are accustomed to observe at the feast of the Saviour's
passion, with fasting and night watching and study of the divine Word. These
things the above-mentioned author has related in his own work, indicating a
mode of life which has been preserved to the present time by us alone,
recording especially the vigils kept in connection with the great festival,
and the exercises performed during those vigils, and the hymns customarily
recited by us, and describing how, while one sings regularly in time, the
others listen in silence, and join in chanting only the close of the hymns;
and how, on the days referred to they sleep on the ground on beds of straw,
and to use his own words,
"taste no wine at all, nor any flesh, but
water is their only drink, and therelish with their bread is salt and hyssop."
In addition to this Philo describes the order of dignities which ists
among those who carry on the services of the church, mentioning the diaconate,
and the office of bishop, which takes the precedence over all the others.
But whosoever desires a more accurate knowledge of these matters may get it
from the history already cited. But that Philo, when he wrote these things,
had in view the first heralds of the Gospel and the customs handed down from
the beginning by the apostles, is clear to every one.
Copious in language, comprehensive in thought, sublime and elevated in his
views of divine Scripture, Philo has produced manifold and various expositions
of the sacred books. On the one hand, he expounds in order the events recorded
in Genesis in the books to which he gives the title Allegories of the Sacred
Laws;
on the other hand, he makes successive divisions-of the chapters in
the Scriptures which are the subject of investigation, and gives objections
and solutions, in the books which he quite suitably calls Questions and
Answers an Genesis and Exodus.
There are, besides these,
treatises
expressly worked out by him on certain subjects, such as the two books On
Agriculture,
and the same number On Drunkenness'
and some others distinguished by different titles corresponding to
the contents of each; for instance, Concerning the things which the Sober Mind
desires and execrates,
On the Confusion of Tongues,
On Flight and
Discovery,
On Assembly for the sake of Instruction,
On the question, Who
is heir to things divine?' or On the division of things into equal and
unequal,
and still further the work On the three Virtues which with
others have been described by Moses.
In addition to these is the work On
those whose Names have been changed and why they have been changed,
in
which he says that he had written also two hooks On Covenants? And there is
also a work of his On Emigration,
and one On the life of a Wise Man made
perfect in Righteousness, or On unwritten taws;
and still further the work
On Giants or On the Immutability of God,
and a first, second, third,
fourth and fifth book On the proposition, that Dreams according to Moses are
sent by God.
These are the hooks on Genesis that have come down to us. But
on Exodus we are acquainted with the first, second, third, fourth and fifth
books of Questions and Answers,'
also with that On tire Tabernacle,
and that On the ten Commandments,
and the four books
On the laws which refer especially to the principal divisions of the ten
Commandments,
and another On animals intended for sacrifice and On the
kinds of sacrifice,
and another On the re -- wards fixed in the law for the
good, and on the punishments and curses fixed for the wicked.
In
addition to all these there are extant also some single-volumed works of
his; as for instance, the work On Providence,
and the book composed by him
On the Jews,
and The Statesman;
and still further, Alexander, or On
the possession of reason by the irrational animals?: Besides these there is a
work On the proposition that every wicked man is a slave, to which is
subjoined the work On the proposition that every goad man is free.
After
these was composed by him the work On the contemplative life, or On
suppliants,
from which we have drawn the facts concerning the life of the
apostolic men; and still further, the Interpretation of the Hebrew names in
the law and in the prophets are said to be the result of his industry.
And
he is said to have read in the presence of the whole Roman Senate during the
reign of Claudius
the work which he had written, when he came to Rome
under Coins, concerning Coins' hatred of the gods, and to which, with ironical
reference to its character, he had given the title On the Virtues.
And his
discourses were so much admired as to be deemed worthy of a place in the
libraries. At this time, while Paul was completing his journey "from
Jerusalem and round about unto Illyricum,"
Claudius drove the Jews out of
Rome; and Aquila and Priscilla, leaving Rome with the other Jews, came to
Asia, and there abode with the apostle Paul, who was confirming the churches
of that region whose
foundations he had newly laid. The sacred book of the Acts informs us also of
these things.
While Claudius was still emperor, it happened that so great a tumult
and disturbance took place in Jerusalem at the feast of the Passover, that
thirty thousand of those Jews alone who were forcibly crowded together at the
gate of the temple perished,
being trampled under foot by one another. Thus
the festival became a season of mourning for all the nation, and there was
weeping in every house. These things are related literally
by Josephus.
But Claudius appointed Agrippa,
son of Agrippa, king of the Jews,
having sent Felix
as procurator of the whole country of Samaria and
Galilee, and of the land called Perea.
And after he had reigned thirteen
years and eight months a he died, and left Nero as his successor in the
empire.
Josephus again, in the twentieth book of his Antiquities, relates the
quarrel which arose among the priests during the reign of Nero, while Felix
was procurator of Judea. His words are as follows
: "There arose a quarrel
between the high priests on the one hand and the priests and leaders of the
people of Jerusalem on the other.
And each of them collected a body of the
boldest and most restless men, and put himself at their head, and whenever
they met they hurled invectives and stones at each other. And there was no one
that would interpose; but these things were done at will as if in a city
destitute of a ruler. And so great was the shamelessness and audacity of the
high priests that they dared to send their servants to the threshing-floors to
seize the tithes due to the priests; and thus those of the priests that were
poor were seen to be perishing of want. In this way did the violence of the
factions prevail over all justice." And the same author again relates that
about the same time there sprang up in Jerusalem a certain kind of
robbers,
" who by day," as he says, "and in the middle of the city slew
those who met them." For, especially at the feasts, they mingled with the
multitude, and with short swords, which they concealed under their garments,
they stabbed the most distinguished men. And when they fell, the murderers
themselves were among those who expressed their indignation. And thus on
account of the
confidence which was reposed in them by all, they remained undiscovered. The
first that was slain by them was Jonathan the
high priest;
and after him many were killed every day, until the fear
became worse than the evil itself, each one, as in battle, hourly expecting
death.
After other matters he proceeds as follows:
"But the Jews were
afflicted with a greater plague than these by the Egyptian false prophet.
For there appeared in the land an impostor who aroused faith in himself as a
prophet, and collected about thirty thousand of those whom he had deceived,
and led them from the desert to the so-called Mount of Olives whence he was
prepared to enter Jerusalem by force and to overpower the Roman garrison and
seize the government of the people, using those who made the attack with him
as body 2. guards. But Felix anticipated his attack, and went out to meet
him with the Roman legionaries, and all the people joined in the defense, so
that when the battle was fought the Egyptian fled with a few followers, but
the most of them were destroyed or taken captive." Josephus relates these
events in the second book of his History.
But it is worth while comparing
the account of the Egyptian given here with that contained in the Acts of the
Apostles. In the time of Felix it was said to Paul by the centurion in
Jerusalem, when the multitude of the Jews raised a disturbance against the
apostle, "Art not thou he Who before these days made an uproar, and led out
into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?"
These are the
events which took place in the time of Felix.
Paul having been sent bound from Judea to Rome, made his Defense, and was
acquitted of every Charge. Festus
was sent by Nero to be Felix's
successor. Under him Paul, having made his defense, was sent bound to Rome
Aristarchus was with him, whom he also somewhere in his epistles quite
naturally calls his fellow-prisoner.
And Luke, who wrote the Acts of the Apostles,
brought his history to a
close at this point, after stating that Paul spent two whole years at Rome as
a prisoner at large, and preached the word of God without restraint.
Thus
after he had made his defense it is said that the apostle was sent again upon
the ministry of preaching,
and that upon coming to the same city a second
time he suffered martyrdom.
In this imprisonment he wrote his second
epistle to Timothy,
in which he mentions his first defense and his
impending death. But hear his testimony on these matters: "At my first
answer," he says, "no man stood with me, but all men forsook me: I pray God
that it may not be laid to their charge. Notwithstanding the Lord stood with
me, and strengthened me; that by me the preaching might be fully known, and
that all the Gentiles might hear: and I was delivered out of the mouth of the
lion."
He plainly indicates in these words that on the former occasion,
in order that the preaching might be fulfilled by him, he was rescued from the
mouth of the lion, referring, in this expression, to Nero, as is probable on
account of the latter's cruelty. He did not therefore afterward add the
similar statement, "He will rescue me from the mouth of the lion"; for he saw
in the spirit that his end would not be long delayed. Wherefore he adds to
the words, "And he delivered me from the mouth of the lion," this sentence:
"The Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his
heavenly kingdom,"
indicating his speedy martyrdom; which he also
foretells still more clearly in the same epistle, when he writes, "For I am
now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand."
In his
second epistle to Timothy, moreover, he indicates that Luke was with him
when he wrote,
but at his first defense not even he.
Whence it is
probable that Luke wrote the Acts of the Apostles at that time, continuing his
history down to the period when he was with Paul.
But these things have
been adduced by us to show that Paul's martyrdom did not take place at the
time of that Roman sojourn which Luke
records. It is probable indeed that as Nero was more disposed to mildness in
the beginning, Paul's defense of his doctrine was more easily received; but
that when he had advanced to the commission of lawless deeds of daring, he
made the apostles as well as others the subjects of his attacks.
But after Paul, in consequence of his appeal to C'sar, had been sent to
Rome by Festus, the Jews, being frustrated in their hope of entrapping him by
the snares which they had laid for him, turned against James, the brother of
the Lord,
to whom the episcopal seat at Jerusalem bad been entrusted by the
apostles.
The following daring measures were undertaken by them against
him. Leading him into their midst they demanded of him that he should renounce
faith in Christ in the presence of all the people. But, contrary to the
opinion of all, with a clear voice, and with greater boldness than they had
anticipated, he spoke out before the whole multitude and confessed that our
Saviour and Lord Jesus is the Son of God. But they were unable to bear
longer the testimony of the man who, on account of the excellence of ascetic
virtue
and of piety which he exhibited in his life, was esteemed by all
as the most just of men, and consequently they slew him. Opportunity for
this deed of violence was furnished by the prevailing anarchy, which was
caused by the fact that Festus had died just at this time in Judea, and that
the province was thus without a governor and head.
The manner of James'
death has been already indicated by the above-quoted words of Clement, who
records that he was thrown from the pinnacle of the temple, and was beaten to
death with a club.
But Hegesippus,
who lived immediately after the
apostles, gives the most accurate account in the fifth book of his
Memoirs.
He writes as follows: "James, the brother of the Lord,
succeeded to the government of the Church in conjunction with the apostles.
He has been called the Just
by all from the time of our Saviour to the
present day; for there were many that bore the name of James. He was holy
from his mother's womb; and he drank no wine nor strong drink, nor did he eat
flesh. No razor came upon his head; he did not anoint himself with oil, and he
did not use the bath. He alone was permitted to enter into the holy place ;
for he wore not woolen but linen garments. And he was in the habit of entering
alone into the temple, and was frequently found upon his knees begging
forgiveness for the people, so that his knees became hard like those of a
camel, in consequence of his constantly bending them in his worship of God,
and asking forgiveness for the people.
Because of his exceeding great
justice he was called the Just, and Oblias,
which signifies in Greek,
Bulwark of the people' and 'Justice,'
in accordance with what the prophets
declare concerning him.
Now some of the seven sects, which existed
among the people and which have been mentioned by me in the Memoirs,
asked him, 'What is the gate of Jesus ?
and he replied that he was the Saviour. On account of these words some
believed that Jesus is the Christ. But the sects mentioned above did not
believe either in a resurrection or in one's coming to give to every man
according to his works.
But as many as believed did so on account of
James. Therefore when many even of the rulers believed, there was a
commotion among the Jews and Scribes and Pharisees, who said that there was
danger that the whole people would be looking for Jesus as the Christ. Coming
therefore in a body to James they said, 'We entreat thee, restrain the people;
for they are gone astray in regard to Jesus, as if he were the Christy We
entreat thee to persuade all that have come to the feast of the Passover
concerning Jesus; for we all have confidence in thee. For we bear thee
witness, as do all the people, that thou art just, and dost not respect per
sons.
Do thou therefore persuade the multitude not to be led astray
concerning Jesus. For the whole people, and all of us also, have confidence in
thee. Stand therefore upon the pinnacle of the temple,
that from that high
position thou mayest be clearly seen, and that thy words may be readily heard
by all the people. For all the tribes, with the Gentiles also, are come
together on account of the Passover.' The aforesaid Scribes and Pharisees
therefore placed James upon the pinnacle of the temple, and cried out to him
and said: Thou just one, in whom we ought all to have: confidence, forasmuch
as the people are led, astray after Jesus, the crucified one, declare to us,
what is the gate of Jesus.'
And he answered with a loud voice,' Why do ye
ask me concerning Jesus, the Son of Man ? He himself sitteth in heaven at the
right hand of the great Power, and is about to come upon the clouds of
heaven.'
And when many were fully convinced and gloried in the
testimony of James, and said, 'Hosanna to the Son of David,' these same
Scribes and Pharisees said again to one another,' We have done badly in
supplying such testimony to Jesus. But let us go up and throw him down, in
order that they may be afraid to believe him.' And they cried out, saying,
'Oh! oh! the just man is also in error.' And they fulfilled the Scripture
written in Isaiah,
' Let us take away
the just man, because he is
troublesome to us: therefore they shall eat the fruit of their doings.' So
they went up and threw down the just man, and said to each other, 'Let us
stone James the Just.' And they began to stone him, for he was not killed by
the fall; but he turned and knelt down and said, 'I entreat thee, Lord God our
Father,
forgive them, for they know not what they do.'
And while
they were thus stoning him one of the priests of the sons of Rechab, the son
of the Rechabites,
who are mentioned by Jeremiah the prophet,
cried
out, saying, 'Cease, what do ye? The just one prayeth for you
And one of them, who was a fuller, took the club with which he beat out
clothes and struck the just man on the head. And thus he suffered
martyrdom.
And they buried him on the spot, by the temple, and his
monument still remains by the temple.
He became a true witness, both to
Jews and Greeks, that Jesus is the Christ. And immediately Vespasian besieged
them."
These things are related at length by Hegesippus, who is in
agreement with Clement.
James was so admirable a man and so celebrated
among all for his justice, that the more sensible even of the Jews were of the
opinion that this was the cause of the siege of Jerusalem, which happened to
them immediately after his martyrdom for no other reason than their
daring act against him. Josephus, at least, has not hesitated to testify
this in his writings, where he says,
"These things happened to the Jews to
avenge James the Just, who was a brother of Jesus, that is called theChrist.
For the Jews slew him, although he was a most just man." And the same
writer records his death also in the twentieth book of his Antiquities in the
following words:
"But the emperor, when he learned of the death of Festus,
sent Albinus
to be procurator of Judea. But the younger Ananus,
who,
as we have already said,
had obtained the high priesthood, was of an
exceedingly bold and reckless disposition. He belonged, moreover, to the sect
of the Sadducees, who are the most cruel of all the Jews in the execution of
judgment, as we have already shown.
Ananus, therefore, being of this
character, and supposing that he had a favorable opportunity on account of the
fact that Festus was dead, and Albinus was still on the way, called together
the Sanhedrim, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, the so-called
Christ, James by name, together with some others,
and accused them of
violating the law, and condemned them to be stoned.
But those in the city
who seemed most moderate and skilled in the law were very angry at this,
and sent secretly to the king,
requesting him to order Ananus to cease
such proceedings. For he had not done right even this first time. And certain
of them also went to meet Albinus, who was journeying from Alexandria, and
reminded him that it was not lawful for Ananus to summon the Sanhedrim without
his knowledge.
And Albinus, being
persuaded by their representations, wrote in anger to Ananus, threatening him
with punishment. And the king, Agrippa, in consequence, deprived him, of the
high priesthood,
which he had held threemonths, and appointed Jesus, the
son of Damnaeus."
These things are recorded in regard to James, who is
said to be the author of the first of the so-called catholic
epistles. But
it is to be observed that it is disputed;
at least, not many of the
ancients have mentioned it, as is the case likewise with the epistle that
bears the name of Jude,
which is also one of the seven so-called catholic
epistles. Nevertheless we know that these also,
with the rest, have been
read publicly in very many churches.
When Nero was in the eighth year of his reign,
Annianus
succeeded
Mark the evangelist in the administration of the parish of Alexandria.
When the government of Nero was now firmly
established, he began to plunge into unholy pursuits, and armed himself even
against the religion of the God of the universe. To describe the greatness of
his depravity does not lie within the plan of the present work. As there are
many indeed that have recorded his history in most accurate narratives,
every one may at his pleasure learn from them the coarseness of the man's
extraordinary madness, under the influence of which, after he had accomplished
the destruction of so many myriads without any reason, he ran into such
blood-guiltiness that he did not spare even his nearest relatives and dearest
friends, but destroyed his mother and his brothers and his wife,
with very
many others of his own family
as he would private and public enemies, with various kinds of deaths. But with
all these things this particular in the catalogue of his crimes was still
wanting, that he was the first of the emperors who showed himself an enemy of
the divine religion. The Roman Tertullian is likewise a witness of this. He
writes as follows:
"Examine your records. There you will find that Nero
was the first that persecuted this doctrine,
particularly then when after
subduing all the east, he exercised his cruelty against all at Rome.
We
glory in having such a man the leader in our punishment. For whoever knows him
can understand that nothing was condemned by Nero unless it was something of
great excellence." Thus publicly announcing himself as the first among God's
chief enemies, he was led on to the slaughter of the apostles. It is,
therefore, recorded that Paul was beheaded in Rome itself,
and that Peter
likewise was crucified under Nero.
This account of Peter and Paul is
substantiated by the fact that their names are preserved in the cemeteries of
that place even to the present day. It is confirmed likewise by Caius,
a member of the Church,
who arose
under Zephyrinus,
bishop of Rome.
He, in a published disputation with Proclus,
the leader of the Phrygian
heresy,
speaks as follows concerning the places where the sacred corpses
of the aforesaid apostles are laid: "But
I can show the trophies of the
apostles. For if you will go to the Vatican
or to the Ostian way,
you
will find the trophies of those who laid the foundations of this church."
And that they both suffered martyrdom at the same time is stated by
Dionysius, bishop of Corinth,
in his epistle to the Romans,
in the
following words: "You have thus by such an admonition bound together the
planting of Peter and of Paul at Rome and Corinth. For both of them planted
and likewise taught us in our Corinth.
And they taught together in like
manner in Italy, and suffered martyrdom at the same time."
I have quoted
these things in order that the truth of the history might be still more
confirmed.
Josephus again, after relating many things in connection with the
calamity which came upon the whole Jewish nation, records,
in addition to
many other circumstances, that a great many
of the most honorable among the
Jews were scourged in Jerusalem itself and then crucified by Florus.
It
happened that he was procurator of Judea when the war began to be kindled, in
the twelfth year of Nero.
Josephus says
that at that time a terrible commotion was stirred up
throughout all Syria in consequence of the revolt of the Jews, and that
everywhere the latter were destroyed without mercy, like enemies, by the
inhabitants of the cities, "so that one could see cities filled with unburied
corpses, and the dead bodies of the aged scattered about with the bodies of
infants, and women without even a covering for their nakedness, and the whole
province full of indescribable calamities, while the dread of those things
that were threatened was greater than the sufferings themselves which they
anywhere endured."
Such is the account of Josephus; and such was the
condition of the Jews at that time.
Church History
Book II
The Course pursued by the Apostles after the Ascension of Christ
How Tiberius was affected when informed by Pilate concerning Christ
The Doctrine of Christ soon spread throughout All the World
Philo's Embassy to Caius in Behalf of the Jews
The Misfortunes which overwhelmed the Jews after their Presumption against Christ
Pilate's Suicide
The Famine which took Place in the Reign of Claudius
The Martyrdom of James the Apostle
Agrippa, who was also called Herod, having persecuted the Apostles, immediately experienced the Divine Vengeance
The Impostor Theudas and his Followers
Helen, the Queen of the Osrhoenians
Simon Magus
The Preaching of the Apostle Peter in Rome
The Gospel according to Mark
Mark first proclaimed Christianity to the Inhabitants of Egypt
Philo's Account of the Ascetics of Egypt
The Works of Philo
that have came down to us
The Calamity which befell the Jews in Jerusalem on the Day of the Passover
The Events which took Place in Jerusalem during the Reign of Nero
The Egyptian, who is mentioned also in the Acts of the Apostles
The Martyrdom of James, who was called the Brother of the Lord
Annianus the First Bishop of the Church of Alexandria after Mark
The Persecution under Nero in which Paul and Peter were honored at Rome with Martyrdom in Behalf of Religion
The Jews, afflicted with Innumerable Evils, commenced the Last War against the Romans